Performance summary charts

Here are the summary charts of 35 games and 2 synthetic tests. The highest settings are always chosen and it is DX11 or DX12 with the settings at ultra or maxed except for DOOM which show both Vulkan and OpenGL results (different areas were benchmarked with each API). Specific settings are listed on the main performance chart.

The benches were run at 1920×1080, 2560×1440, and at 3840×2160.  All results, except for Firestrike and Time Spy, show average framerates, and higher is always better. In-game settings are fully maxed out and they are identically high or ultra across all platforms.  “X” means the benchmark was not run as many new games have been added in the past 6 months to BTR’s benchmarking suite.

The first three columns are devoted to the RX 480 results with the latest drivers 16.12.1 being used in Column 1, and the July 16.7.2 drivers compared in Column 2, with Column 3 devoted to the launch drivers, 16.6.2.   The 290X results are given in the next two columns with Column 4 using the latest drivers and Column 5 using 16.6.2 drivers.  The last two columns show the GTX 1060 results with Column 6 showing the latest 376.33 drivers and the last Column 7 giving the performance results with the 368.64 launch drivers.

Please open the charts in separate windows or tabs for better viewing.

Our charts provide a lot of information across 35 games and 2 synthetics.  What we can take away from the results generally is that the 290X and the RX 480 have gained some significant ground on the GTX 1060 over the past six months.

We were very surprised that the latest NVIDIA driver WHQL 376.33 has seen some serious performance drops with at least 6 games compared with the GTX 1060 launch driver.  There are significant performance drops in Rainbow 6 Siege, Shadows of Mordor, Batman AK, Rise of the Tomb Raider, Warhammer, and Fallout 4 using the GTX 1060 6GB compared with the newest driver.  There are certainly some performance improvements in the rest of the benchmark suite, but the decreases are surprising.

Of course, it’s always possible that game patches have changed performance since the launch. So we tried these six games back to back with the launch driver versus the new driver just to make sure that something else wasn’t at play.  And the launch drivers in each of these six cases outperformed the latest drivers by similar margins to what is reported on the charts.

We also note that AMD has made good performance progress with the RX 480 since its launch, but much of the performance increases already came a month after its launch with 16.7.2.  And what is perhaps even more surprising is that the 290X has continued to improve at nearly the same rate at the RX480!

Let’s head for our conclusion.


 The Conclusion


The GTX 1060 is still the fastest of the three cards that we have tested using our maxed-out 35 game benchmark suite when you consider its overclocking ability. However, the RX 480 and the 290X have managed to gain some real ground on the GTX 1060.  We can also conclude that AMD has not neglected Hawaii at all, but each driver revision tends to bring more performance than the last.  On the other hand, we were very surprised to see that the GTX 1060 actually lost some performance in a few games with the latest driver compared with its launch driver.

BTR has purchased a Oculus Rift this week, and we have been playing VR games with great success on our GTX 1060.  We plan to compare the experience of playing VR games on AMD versus playing on NVIDIA cards in the coming weeks.  Stay tuned.

In the meantime, we are currently running a contest that ends on Christmas day. It features a really nice prize bundle for the grand prize winner that is supplied by Kingston with the choice of any PC game under $60 going to the runner up!   If you want to enter, join BTR community forums and tell us why you deserve to win.  Everyone who enters is a winner as our tech discussions are among the best to be found anywhere!

Happy Gaming!

Mark Poppin

BTR Editor-in-Chief



  1. These results are incredible, make sure that you guys compare the rx 480 and gtx 1060 once they age by the way, i’d be awesome to see a comparison between the 280x and 780 ^^

    • This. Also they should do a comparison between the R9 380 and the GTX 960. Most sites wrote that the GTX 960 was faster. Tomshardware went so far to write that the GTX 950 is extremely close to the 960 (so close that they couldn’t recommend the 960 anymore) and ahead of the 380. Yeah right. In all 2016 reviews, the 380 destroys the 960, while the 950 is far behind. If you want to have a good laugh, read their review.

  2. Why am I now finding out about this. I been slacking. Great job on all the work you put in for this!

  3. Fine Wine baby. Still running waterblocked 290x’s in CF in one of my rigs. Bought them when they came out and they just keep getting better. They are hot and draw a lot of power, especially overclocked like mine, but they hold a special place in my heart haha. The RX 480 is great for budget builds I guess, but its pretty sad that the only real improvement is power draw and temps. Only recently broke down and bought a gtx 1080 for a newer rig to get away from using crossfire.

  4. Got a 290X MATRIX in reserve and a 390X STRIX in my wife’s systems Still very solid cards for 1080p and some 1440p titles. Basically though 480 ~390X~290X and 1060 6GB ~980~780Ti. Really this is all top end 2013 performance. Same as 1070~980Ti.

  5. If I’m reading these right the majority of the 1060 results have got worse, Is that right? All within margin of error but a definite downward trend.

Comments are closed.